Good Cause Eviction (GCE) in New York

Good Cause Eviction (GCE) is a legal framework in New York that protects tenants from arbitrary evictions by requiring landlords to provide a valid reason, or “good cause,” for terminating a tenancy or refusing to renew a lease. Enacted as part of broader tenant protection reforms, GCE aims to stabilize housing for renters, particularly in high-cost areas, by limiting landlords’ ability to evict tenants without justification. Below is a clear explanation of GCE, tailored to the context of New York, including Nassau and Suffolk County, as of 2025.

What is Good Cause Eviction?

GCE laws mandate that landlords can only evict tenants or decline to renew a lease for specific reasons outlined in the law. These reasons typically include:

· Non-payment of rent: The tenant fails to pay rent owed, provided the rent increase is deemed reasonable (see below).

· Lease violations: The tenant breaches lease terms, such as causing property damage, engaging in illegal activities, or creating a nuisance.

· Substantial lease violations: Repeated or severe breaches, like unauthorized subletting or refusing landlord access for necessary repairs.

· Landlord’s personal use: The landlord seeks to recover the unit for their own use or for a family member, though this is subject to strict conditions.

· Property sale or demolition: The landlord intends to sell the property or convert it for non-residential use, with proper notice and documentation.

Without one of these valid reasons, a landlord cannot evict a tenant or force them to vacate, even if the lease term has expired.

Key Features of GCE

· Rent Increase Protections:

· GCE includes a rebuttable presumption that rent increases exceeding 5% plus the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or 10% of the current rent (whichever is less) are “unreasonable.”

· If a tenant challenges an eviction based on non-payment of an excessive rent increase, the landlord must prove in court that the increase is reasonable, considering factors like market rates, property improvements, or operating costs.

· Applicability:

· As of 2025, GCE is fully implemented in New York City for most market-rate apartments in buildings with six or more units, following the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act (HSTPA) and subsequent legislation.

· In Nassau and Suffolk County, GCE may apply if local municipalities opt in, as the law allows cities, towns, or villages to adopt GCE for their jurisdictions. Tenants in rent-stabilized units or buildings with fewer than six units may have different protections.

· Exemptions:

· GCE typically does not apply to owner-occupied buildings with fewer than six units, condos, co-ops, or units where the rent exceeds 245% of the fair market rent (as defined by HUD).

· Newer buildings (constructed after a certain date, often 2009) may also be exempt, depending on local regulations.

Process and Tenant Rights

· Notice Requirements: Landlords must provide written notice specifying the good cause for eviction, typically 30 to 90 days, depending on the tenancy length or reason.

· Court Oversight: Evictions under GCE must go through housing court, where tenants can contest the landlord’s claims. Tenants may request adjournments or legal representation, often available through legal aid organizations like Nassau/Suffolk Law Services in Suffolk County.

· Retaliation Protections: Landlords cannot evict tenants in retaliation for exercising their rights, such as reporting code violations or organizing with other tenants.

Impact in Suffolk County

In Suffolk County, GCE’s adoption depends on local government action, as towns like Huntington or Islip can choose to implement it. Where applicable, GCE strengthens tenant protections by preventing evictions driven by speculative rent hikes or landlord whims. However, landlords retain the right to evict for legitimate reasons, provided they follow due process. Tenants benefit from increased stability, while landlords must ensure compliance with notice and documentation requirements to avoid legal challenges.

Current Trends in Landlord-Tenant Law in Suffolk County, NY (2025)

Landlord-tenant law in Suffolk County, New York, continues to evolve, reflecting broader state-level reforms and local ordinances aimed at balancing the rights and responsibilities of landlords and tenants. As of 2025, several key trends are shaping the legal landscape, driven by legislative changes, tenant protections, and judicial practices. These trends impact rental agreements, eviction processes, and anti-discrimination measures, creating a dynamic environment for property owners and renters alike. 

One significant trend is the continued influence of New York’s Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act (HSTPA) of 2019, which has reshaped landlord-tenant dynamics across the state, including Suffolk County. The HSTPA imposes strict limits on rent increases for rent-stabilized units, caps fees, and enhances tenant protections against arbitrary evictions. In Suffolk County, where rent stabilization applies in certain communities, landlords must adhere to guidelines set by the state’s Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR). For instance, landlords can only claim up to three Individual Apartment Improvements (IAIs) within a 15-year period, with costs capped at $15,000, and these increases are temporary, expiring after 30 years. This ensures tenants are not burdened with excessive rent hikes tied to renovations. 

Another notable development is the implementation of Good Cause Eviction (GCE) laws, effective in New York City and potentially applicable to other municipalities like Suffolk County by 2025. GCE prevents landlords from evicting tenants without a specified “good cause,” such as non-payment of rent or lease violations. A rebuttable presumption exists that rent increases exceeding 5% plus the Consumer Price Index (or 10% of the existing rent, whichever is less) are unreasonable, requiring landlords to justify higher increases in court. While primarily enforced in NYC, Suffolk County landlords should monitor local adoption, as it could limit their ability to terminate leases without cause, especially for market-rate apartments. 

Anti-discrimination protections remain a critical focus in Suffolk County. Landlords with buildings containing three or more units cannot refuse to rent based on a tenant’s lawful source of income, such as Section 8 vouchers or public assistance. Additionally, federal and state laws prohibit discrimination based on race, gender, disability, or other protected characteristics. Suffolk County’s Human Rights Commission provides a local avenue for tenants to file grievances if they suspect discriminatory practices, reinforcing fair housing standards. 

The eviction process in Suffolk County is also under scrutiny, with courts emphasizing procedural compliance. Evictions for non-payment of rent require a 14-day Notice to Pay, while holdover proceedings (e.g., lease expiration) mandate 30 to 90 days’ notice, depending on tenancy length. Courts in Suffolk County are known to favor landlords in disputes, but tenants can delay proceedings by requesting adjournments or legal representation, often provided pro bono by organizations like Nassau/Suffolk Law Services. Illegal lockouts or utility shutoffs are strictly prohibited, and tenants can sue for triple damages in such cases. 

Finally, lease requirements in Suffolk County mandate that landlords offer written leases of at least one year for buildings with three or more units, enhancing tenant security. This trend underscores the county’s commitment to formalizing rental agreements to prevent disputes. 

In conclusion, Suffolk County’s landlord-tenant laws in 2025 reflect a tenant-friendly framework, with robust protections against unfair rent increases, discriminatory practices, and unjust evictions. Landlords must navigate these regulations carefully, while tenants benefit from increased legal recourse and support. Staying informed through resources like the Suffolk County Bar Association or local housing services is essential for both parties to thrive in this evolving legal landscape. 

For more information, or if you or someone you know needs assistance with a landlord-tenant matter in Suffolk County, New York, please contact landlord-tenant attorney Jim Clark.   

Data Scraping Lawsuit Appeals to Supreme Court

A federal lawsuit is set to go before the Supreme Court that will deal with the controversial practice known as “data scraping.” This practice, used by some companies to collect data on consumers for research and marketing purposes, has become controversial due to concerns over privacy violations. However, this lawsuit goes one step further, alleging that data scraping may be a violation of federal law, potentially introducing liability for any company that engages in data scraping. Continue reading “Data Scraping Lawsuit Appeals to Supreme Court”

BIPA Lawsuit Survives Article III Standing Challenge

In a move that may have substantial consequences for companies that collect biometric data, the Seventh Circuit has held that a violation of the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) alone constitutes sufficient harm to establish standing under Article III of the United States Constitution. This means that any company that violates BIPA by failing to adequately protect biometric data could be held legally liable for a data breach. This ruling is a significant victory for consumer privacy, and a warning to companies who collect and store biometric data from their customers or clients. Continue reading “BIPA Lawsuit Survives Article III Standing Challenge”

DOL Finalizes Rule Clarifying Franchising and Joint Employment

construction worker on scaffoldingThe Department of Labor (DOL) has issued its final rule regarding the relationship between franchisor and franchisee, with respect to possible joint employment status under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Namely, they have clarified that the existence of a franchising relationship does not make the franchisor more or less likely to be a joint employer. Instead, they have affirmed a set of criteria that, considered as a whole, is determinative of whether joint employment exists or not. Continue reading “DOL Finalizes Rule Clarifying Franchising and Joint Employment”

Fifth Circuit Affirms ACA Individual Mandate is Unconstitutional

U.S. ConstitutionThe Fifth Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals has affirmed a district court ruling in part that says the individual mandate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is unconstitutional. While the district court went further to argue that the entire ACA, more colloquially known as Obamacare, was unconstitutional, the Fifth Circuit narrowly ruled on the constitutionality of the individual mandate. It then remanded the case back to the district court to determine what provisions, if any, were severable from the individual mandate. Continue reading “Fifth Circuit Affirms ACA Individual Mandate is Unconstitutional”

Limitations of Factoring Agreements Under No Fault Law

Factoring AgreementsAn interesting question has arisen as to who can collect no-fault benefits under New York law. New York regulations provide that only the patient and the provider can sue or arbitrate for medical benefits under the no-fault law. The question that arises is what happens when the provider assigns his medical benefits to a finance company or factor who purchases the accounts receivables or obtains a lien against them? (Learn more about how a factoring agreement works.)

Under New York law, the finance company or factor cannot sue to collect the receivables that are generated under the no-fault law because they are neither the provider nor the patient. Continue reading “Limitations of Factoring Agreements Under No Fault Law”

Deciding Where to Initiate a Lawsuit

Initiate a LawsuitWhen you decide to sue, before you make that first move, you need to think through where you are going to file the lawsuit. Selecting a forum may have a major impact on both the costs and the results of the litigation. In many litigations there is more than one forum in which the lawsuit can be started.

In New York State, it can be brought in the county where the plaintiff lives, the county the plaintiff’s business is in, the county where the performance of the contract was to take place or the county in which the event giving rise to the suit occurred. Continue reading “Deciding Where to Initiate a Lawsuit”

Important Considerations Before Launching a Lawsuit

Lawsuit ChecklistIn deciding whether or not to sue there are three important considerations, and without all three a lawsuit generally cannot succeed: (1) there must be a liability (or a basis for getting relief); (2) there must be damages (and under New York law damages are sometimes not easy to prove and may require expert testimony unless it is plain and easy to calculate); and (3) there must be a “pocket” or source of funds from the parties who are liable for the damages, to pay a judgment.

Many people commence lawsuits without having all three factors in mind. If you don’t have at least two of the three factors clearly defined in your mind — and at least a reasonable chance that the third factor exists — usually the lawsuit should not be brought. Continue reading “Important Considerations Before Launching a Lawsuit”

The Health Care Reform Law — Is Your Practice at Risk?

Health Care Reform LawThe Health Care Reform Law commits the government to more aggressive efforts to find and prosecute Medicare fraud. Under the new law, funding will be increased to aid those efforts. The number of Medicare Fraud investigative offices across the country will double, so the agency will have the people and resources to address this serious problem. Continue reading “The Health Care Reform Law — Is Your Practice at Risk?”

Contact Us Today For Your FREE Consultation

Skip to content